The most common solution for criminal behavior is prison but many believe education is a better method.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Imprisonment is often considered a more effective solution than education to prevent crimes. In my opinion, although investing in educational resources can lower crime rates to a certain extent, severe punishments still play a more crucial role in surmounting this persistent problem.
Proponents of education argue its positive impact on society in the long-term. The motives for criminal activity are often deeply rooted in underlying factors ranging from poverty to a lack of accessibility to formal education. Therefore, governments can set aside funds to realistically ensure free and available education for individuals from impoverished backgrounds, aiding them in their chances of becoming employed with well-paid jobs. There is anecdotal evidence that in countries with low crime rates such as Singapore and Canada, the general citizenry has easy access to education and therefore are less likely to ever require criminal means of support.
However, imprisonment is justifiable as it best ensures public safety. Firstly, criminals cannot continue committing crimes when they are serving sentences in jails. Isolating criminals is the best way to protect society for extended periods, especially in cases of convicted murderers, rapists, kidnappers and other serious offences, eliminating even the slightest chance these criminals will continue to harm other individuals. Sentencing criminals to prisons can also effectively deter criminal acts. Those possessing the intention of taking part in illegal activities will naturally have to consider the risk of potentially losing their freedom. This is exemplified in nations with severe sentencing laws such as Vietnam, where the government sentences illegal drug traffickers to life imprisonment and has successfully curbed the number of drug-related incidence as a result.
In conclusion, although educational provision can partly reduce crime rates, putting offenders in jails is by far the most effective form of deterrence. Governments should naturally combine both methods to engender the most desirable outcomes.
Words: 303
Vocabularies:
Imprisonment sự bỏ tù
Consider coi
Educational resources tài nguyên giáo dục
To a certain extent tới một mức độ nhất định
Severe punishment hình phạt nghiêm trọng
Play a more crucial role đóng vai trò quan trọng hơn
Surmounting vượt qua / giải quyết
Persistent dai dẳng
Proponents người ủng hộ
Argue cho rằng
Motives động cơ
Deeply rooted from bắt nguồn sâu xa từ
Underlying factors các nhân tố cơ bản
Poverty sự nghèo khổ
A lack of accessibility to formal education sự thiếu tiếp cận với giáo dục chính quy
Set aside funds dành ra các quỹ
Realistically một cách thực tế
Impoverished backgrounds hoàn cảnh khó khăn
Aiding them in their chances gia tăng khả năng
Well-paid jobs công việc được trả lương tốt
Anecdotal evidence bằng chứng mang tính giai thoại
The general citizenry người dân nói chung
Criminal means of support phạm tội để có tiền sống
Imprisonment sự bỏ tù
Justifiable chính đáng
Ensure đảm bảo
Public safety sự an toàn cho công chúng
Commiting crimes thực hiện tội ác
Serving sentences chịu án
Jails nhà tù
Isolating cô lập
Extended period giai đoạn dài
In cases of trong những trường hợp
Convicted bị kết án
Murderers kẻ giết người
Rapists kẻ hiếp dâm
Kidnappers kẻ bắt cóc
Serious offences tội nghiêm trọng
Eliminating loại bỏ
The slightest chance cơ hội bé nhất
Deter răn đe
Possessing sở hữu
Intention ý định
Taking part in tham gia vào
Illegal activities hoạt động phi pháp
Consider cân nhắc kĩ lưỡng
Losing their freedom mất đi sự tự do
Severe nghiêm khắc
Sentencing laws luật xử án
Drug traffickers kẻ buôn ma túy
Life imprisonment tù chung thân
Curbed giới hạn
Drug-related liên quan đến ma túy
Incidence tần suất xảy ra
Educational provision Việc cung cấp giáo dục
Partly một phần
Offenders tội phạm
By far cho tới bây giờ
Deterrence sự răn đe
Engender tạo ra
Desireable outcomes kết quả mong muốn