Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets , while others argue that this is a misuse of funds.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Many feel that the government should provide funding for individuals who pursue artistic endeavors, while others would contend otherwise. In my opinion, although the work of artists has cultural value, I would argue against state financial support as this initiative would be largely impractical and the money can be better spent on other, more meaningful purposes.
Proponents of the provision of financial aid for artists typically point to their considerable impact on a country’s cultural identity. Many governments justifiably make budgetary allocations towards traditional artforms, particularly those that are culturally significant yet in decline. For instance, the Vietnamese government has consistently strived in recent decades to make traditional performing arts such as water puppetry theatre a financially viable career option. The preservation of such art forms can in turn attract tourists and generate new sources of revenue for both locals directly and the government indirectly. The positive financial implications of such initiatives are evident in nations such as Japan, where age-old drama artforms such as Noh and Kabuki have become popular tourist attractions, stimulating local economies.
However, I believe that these financial incentives should be discouraged as they are wasteful in the long term. As the demand for traditional artworks declines, it is only natural for them to gradually disappear and be replaced by more modern and relevant artistic works. For example, instead of relying on hand-drawn paintings and drawings, animation studios can now utilize AI-generated arts to instantly and inexpensively create characters and scenes in movies. Another argument in favor of discontinuing the provision of financial aid for artists is that this funding can be better utilized to serve the practical interests of the general citizenry. For instance, investments in improving roads, hospitals, and educational standards can directly benefit most citizens and create tangible progress for a specific country.
In conclusion, although the distribution of budgetary expenses towards supporting artists can preserve a nation’s valuable cultural heritage, a more advisable and realistic plan is to raise living standards of a given populace. Governments should not interfere with the process of old art forms naturally disappearing and promote new ones instead.
Words: 352
Provide funding cung cấp tiền
Artistic endeavors việc cố gắng làm nghệ thuật
Cultural value giá trị văn hóa
State financial support hỗ trợ tài chính từ chính phủ
Initiative sáng kiến
Impractical không thực tế
Proponents những người ủng hộ
Provision sự cung cấp
Financial aid tiền trợ cấp
Considerable impact tác động đáng kể
Cultural identity bản sắc dân tộc
Justifiably biện minh
Budgetary allocation phân bổ ngân sách
Traditional art forms hình thức nghệ thuật truyền thống
Culturally significant quan trọng với nền văn hóa
In decline suy giảm
Consistently thường xuyên
Strived to cố gắng
Performing arts nghệ thuật biểu diễn
Water puppetry theater rạp múa rối nước
Financially viable khả thi về tài chính
Career option lựa chọn sự nghiệp
Preservation sự bảo tồn
Financial implications tác động tài chính
Evident rõ ràng
Age-old lâu đời
Drama diễn kịch
Tourist attractions địa điểm thu hút khách du lịch
Stimulating kích thích
Local economies nền kinh tế địa phương
Financial incentives vật khích lệ tài chính
Wasteful lãng phí
Artworks tác phẩm nghệ thuật
Hand-drawn vẽ bằng tay
Animation studios công ty sản xuất phim hoạt hình
Utilize tận dụng
AI-generated được tạo ra bởi AI
Instantly ngay lập tức
Inexpensively rẻ
In favor of ủng hộ
Discontinue không tiếp tục
Serve the practical interests phục vụ lợi ích thực tế
The general citizenry dân số nói chung
Tangible progress tiến bộ hữu hình
Distribution sự phân bổ
Budgetary expenses chi phí ngân sách
Valuable cultural heritage di sản văn hóa có giá trị
Advisable nên làm
Realistic thực tế
Raise living standards gia tăng tiêu chuẩn sống
Interfere can thiệp
Promote thúc đẩy