Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however, believe that it is not right to use animals in this research.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some believe that animal testing is necessary to develop effective and safe drugs for human consumption, while others argue that this treatment is morally wrong and therefore should be completely banned. In my opinion, despite the cruelty imposed on experimented creatures, this should remain a common practice due to its significant implication for major medical breakthroughs.
Detractors of animal experimentation argue its undeniable inhumanity. As well as being subjected to unsanitary and confined living conditions, the creatures used for experimental purposes are also tortured through various barbaric procedures ranging from being starved, electrocuted and injected with poisonous substances. As a result, most of them suffer from malnutrition, excruciating pain and face a strong likelihood of being killed in the process. Furthermore, experimenters usually breed these animals for future research, which leads to an endless cycle of torment lasting many generations. A pertinent example of this is that small rodents including rats and hamsters are injected with cancerous cells and die painfully shortly thereafter as a consequence.
However, these experiments still play a crucial role in ensuring safety and potency of potential human medicine. Rats are scientifically proven to have the same genetic material as humans, thus a possible human reaction can be inferred from testing on these animals first. Medical researchers can use these testing results to devise drugs with minimal side effects when adopted for humans. This advancement in the pharmaceutical industry could engender better remedies to possibly treat previously fatal and incurable diseases. Prior successful experiments have led to the creation of new treatments that not only prolong the life expectancy of immunocompromised patients but also make considerable progress in the fight against cancer.
In conclusion, although testing on animals can be seen as a brutal action, the positive ramifications associated with medicinal development make this an essential and required practice to enhance welfare for humanity as a whole. Scientists should consider giving these experimented creatures the best possible living environment to partly compensate for their suffering.
Words: 329
Vocabularies:
Treatment cách đối xử
Morally wrong sai trái về mặt đạo đức
Cruelty sự tàn nhẫn
Common practice thông lệ
Significant implication ứng dụng quan trọng
Medical breakthroughs đột phá y học
Detractors người phản đối
Inhumanity vô nhân đạo
Subjected to chịu đựng
Unsanitary thiếu vệ sinh
Confined bị giam cầm
Experimental purposes mục đích thí nghiệm
Tortured tra tấn
Barbaric procedures thủ tục man rợ
Starved bỏ đối
Electrocuted giật điện
Injected tiêm
Poisonous substances chất độc
Malnutrition suy dinh dưỡng
Excruciating pain đau đớn tột cùng
Breed nhân giống
Endless tất tận
Cycle chu kỳ
Torment sự đau khổ
Rodents động vật gặm nhấm
Cancerous cells tế bào ung thư
Potency hiệu lực
Genetic material vật liệu di truyền
Inferred suy ra
Devise tạo ra
Minimal tối thiểu
Side effects tác dụng phụ
Pharmaceutical industry ngành dược phẩm
Engender tạo ra
Remedies phương chữa
Fatal gây tử vong
Incurable nan y
Prolong kéo dài
Life expectancy tuổi thọ
Immunocompromised suy giảm miễn dịch
Make considerable progress đạt được tiến bộ đáng kể
Brutal tàn bạo
Ramification kết quả
Associated with liên quan đến
Welfare phúc lợi
Consider cân nhắc
Compensate bù đắp
Suffering sự đau khổ