Nowadays, there is more and more competition for getting into university.
Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, there has been increasingly intense competition for university admissions. In my opinion, although this propensity engenders a more skilled labor force, it places immense pressure on students, which is unequivocally negative.
Those in favor of more intense competition argue it contributes to a superior workforce. When universities in general raise their admission standards, students have to study more intensively to maximize their chances of being accepted. A pertinent example of this is in China where difficult university entrance examinations encourage excellent, disciplined, and hard-working students. The fact that only the best students can pursue tertiary education typically translates to a more productive division of labor in society. This is one of the deciding factors that has pushed countries like China to not only enjoy significantly improved living standards for the average person but also advance economically as a collective nation.
However, I would contend the pressure placed on students outweighs the perceived benefits. Fierce competition to enter prestigious universities may compel students to sacrifice personal priorities such as sleep and their hobbies to allocate more time towards studying, which often results in long-term mental and physical health deterioration. Recently conducted research and surveys have shown that high school students in China experience social and familial pressure to study twelve hours or more a day in preparation for the national undergraduate admission exams. This in turn predisposes many students to developing anxiety disorders and clinical depression. As each student must study hard to excel, this perpetuates the cycle of stress and burnout.
In conclusion, despite the positives concomitant with economic growth, increased competition to enroll in leading universities is decidedly negative since it leads to unfavorable health outcomes for students. Regulatory bodies should de-emphasis on selective testing and focus more on equal opportunity initiatives.
Words: 288
Intense competition cạnh tranh căng thẳng
University admissions kỳ thi đại học
Propensity khuynh hướng
Engender tạo ra
Skilled labor force lực lượng lao động có trình độ
Places pressure on đặt áp lực lên
Unequivocally hoàn toàn
In favor of ủng hộ
Superior tốt hơn
Workforce lực lượng lao động
Admission standards tiêu chuẩn đầu vào
Study intensively học chăm chỉ
Maximize tối ưu hóa
A pertinent example một ví dụ liên quan
Encourage thúc đẩy
Disciplined có tính kỷ luật
Tertiary education giáo dục cấp đại học
Division sự phân chia
Deciding factors nhân tố quyết định
Significantly improved living standards tiêu chuẩn sống cao hơn
Advance economically phát triển về mặt kinh tế
Collective nation nhờ nỗ lực của từng người / nhóm trong nước
Contend nghĩ rằng
Outweigh trội hơn
Fierce competition cạnh tranh căng thẳng
Prestigious uy tín
Compel buộc
Sacrifice hy sinh
Personal priorities sự ưu tiên cá nhân
Allocate phân bổ
Deterioration suy giảm
Recently conducted mới được thực hiện
Social and familial pressure áp lực từ xã hội và gia đình
In preparation for để chuẩn bị cho
In turn từ đó
Predispose khiến
Anxiety disorders chứng rối loạn lo âu
Clinical depression trầm cảm ở mức nặng
Excel trở nên xuất sắc
Perpetuates kéo dài
Cycle chu kỳ
Concomitant with liên quan đến
Enroll in nhập học
Decidedly
Unfavorable health outcomes sức khỏe không tốt
Regulatory bodies cơ quan điều hành
Less emphasis ít sự đặt nặng hơn vào