Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Many feel that only certain historic structures warrant restoration and rehabilitation. In my opinion, despite high maintenance costs, the economic implications and sense of identity that these buildings ideally evoke make this initiative unequivocally positive.
Proponents of preserving old buildings typically argue their significant historical importance. These structures are remnants of bygone eras, providing visitors a glimpse into the past and engendering a sense of community within any given population. A pertinent example of this fact is Hoa Lo prison in Vietnam, where figures of national heroes on display are preserved by local authorities in order to evoke feelings of belonging and attachment in visitors. Relatedly, these buildings are irreplaceable as it is nearly impossible to achieve the same level of high-quality workmanship with modern materials and labor. For instance, the construction of enduring artistic structures ranging from Blue Mosque and Buckingham Palace to the Taj Mahal and the pyramids are impossible without highly-skilled masons, woodcarvers and sculptors.
Those who argue against the preservation of old buildings generally point to their high maintenance costs. The upkeep for historic buildings requires tremendous levels of craftsmanship and decorative materials that are prohibitively expensive. The best evidence of this reality is statistics that show the overwhelming costs to maintain stained glass, ornamental plaster, and chandeliers in the Palace of Versailles. Nonetheless, the uniqueness of these structures attract tourists globally and therefore far outweighs the negative financial repercussions. Similar popular tourist attractions like Gothic cathedrals in Western Europe promote tourism, generating millions of dollars and contributing significantly to economic growth.
In conclusion, although the maintenance of most historical buildings is costly, the economic implications concomitant with these structures make this decision eminently sensible. Governments should always place great emphasis on preserving historically important buildings.
Words: 290
Historic lịch sử (quan trọng)
Warrant khiến điều gì đó là cần thiết
Restoration sự phục hồi
Rehabilitation sự cải tạo
Maintenance bảo trì
Economic implications tác động kinh tế
Identity danh tính
Evoke gợi nên
Initiative phương án / kế hoạch
Unequivocally hoàn toàn
Proponents người ủng hộ
Remnants những thứ còn lại
Bygone eras kỷ nguyên đã qua
Glimpse cái nhìn thoáng qua
On display được trưng bày
National heroes anh hùng dân tộc
Preserved được giữ gìn
Local authorities chính quyền địa phương
Attachment gắn bó
Irreplaceable không thể thay thế được
Workmanship sự khéo léo
Enduring có tình trường tồn
Artistic mang tính nghệ thuật
Masons thợ cắt đá
Woodcarvers thợ chạm khắc gỗ
Sculptors thợ điêu khắc
Preservation sự giữ gìn
Upkeep việc bảo trì
Prohibitively expensive cực kỳ đắt
Overwhelming costs chi phí rất cao
Stained glass kính màu
Ornamental plaster thạch cao trang trí
Chandeliers đèn chùm
Nonetheless tuy nhiên
Uniqueness sự độc nhất
Financial repercussions hậu quả tài chính
Outweigh trội hơn
Tourist attractions điểm thu hút khách du lịch
Cathedrals nhà thờ lớn
Concomitant with liên quan đến
Eminently rõ ràng
Sensible hợp lý
Place great emphasis đặt nhiều trọng tâm vào