Wild animals and birds protection

Some people claim that it is necessary to spend a lot of resources on protecting wild animals and birds.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many feel that excessive budgetary allocation to preserve wildlife is essential. In my opinion, although human intervention is unnatural to an extent, it is still an overall positive for humans to take action to prevent irreparable damage in the future.

Detractors of conservation efforts claim that human involvement in nature can disrupt the ecological balance. The natural cycle of life and death promotes biological diversity and maintains a critical balance for the environment as a whole. Human interference is likely to disrupt the food chain as certain animals will flourish while others may die out. Furthermore, investment in protecting wild animals can be a serious economic burden for less developed nations. Most endangered species are located in Asia and South America where there is widespread poverty and common occurrences of natural disasters such as floods and droughts. Therefore, the authorities justifiably prioritize human interests over safeguarding animals. 

However, animal extinctions are mostly caused by human activities, therefore  it is only reasonable for humans to accept responsibility. Human activities ranging from industrial growth to deforestation have contributed to contaminated waterways and polluted air, resulting in many animals being on the verge of extinction. Therefore, humans should be obligated to provide protection for these animals to prevent irreversible consequences. Thriving biodiversity also plays an integral role in human life as it aids medical development and ensures stable food sources. For this reason, investment should be required to limit the devastating effects on wildlife, preventing future generations from possibly living less convenient and comfortable lifestyles.

In conclusion, despite the financial costs, a significant amount of resources should be distributed to conserve species that may become extinct. The government and society must be cognizant and subsidize conservation programs immediately.

Words: 288

Excessive quá nhiều 

Budgetary allocation sự phân bổ ngân sách 

Preserve giữ gìn 

Wildlife động vật hoang dã 

Human intervention sự can thiệp của con người 

To an extent tới một mức độ 

Take action hành động 

Irreparable damage tổn thất / thiệt hại không thể sửa chữa được

Detractors người phản đối 

Conservation effort nỗ lực bảo tồn 

Human involvement sự liên can của con người 

Disrupt gián đoạn

Ecological balance sự cân bằng hệ sinh thái 

Natural cycle chu kỳ tự nhiên 

Promote thúc đẩy 

Biological diversity sự đa dạng sinh học 

Critical quan trọng 

As a whole nhìn chung 

Food chain chuỗi thức ăn 

Flourish phát triển 

Die out tuyệt chủng 

Serious economic burden gánh nặng kinh tế nghiêm trọng 

Less developed nations các quốc gia kém phát triển hơn 

Endangered species loài động vật sắp tuyệt chủng 

Widespread poverty nghèo đói diện rộng 

Common occurrences sự xảy ra thường xuyên 

Natural disasters thảm họa tự nhiên 

Floods lũ lụt

Droughts hạn hán 

Authorities nhà chức trách

Justifiably chính đáng 

Prioritize ưu tiên 

Safeguarding bảo vệ 

Extinctions sự tuyệt chủng 

Reasonable hợp lý 

Accept responsibility chấp nhận trách nhiệm 

Industrial growth sự phát triển công nghiệp 

Contaminated waterways đường nước bị ô nhiễm 

On the verge of extinction trên bờ vực tuyệt chủng

To be obligated to phải có nghĩa vụ 

Irreversible consequences hậu quả không thể đảo ngược được

Thriving phát triển 

Plays an integral role đóng vai trò quan trọng 

Aid hỗ trợ 

Stable food sources nguồn lương thực ổn định 

Devastating effects hiệu ứng tàn phá 

Distributed phân bổ 

Conserve bảo tồn 

Cognizant nhận thức 

Subsidize trợ cấp